Comments on: 2/14/2012 – We’re baa-aack! http://comiccritics.com/2012/02/15/2142012-were-baa-aack/ Saving the world from bad comics. One rant at a time! Tue, 21 May 2013 08:33:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: MrGBH http://comiccritics.com/2012/02/15/2142012-were-baa-aack/comment-page-1/#comment-5918 MrGBH Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:51:12 +0000 http://comiccritics.com/?p=928#comment-5918 I’m not sure if it’s really worthwhile having a blog post for each comic. After all, if people want to talk about the comic, we can just do it on the comic’s own post.

Oh yeah, welcome back too.

]]> By: adam ford http://comiccritics.com/2012/02/15/2142012-were-baa-aack/comment-page-1/#comment-5907 adam ford Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:04:14 +0000 http://comiccritics.com/?p=928#comment-5907 Welcome back guys – you were missed.

]]> By: ThatNickGuy http://comiccritics.com/2012/02/15/2142012-were-baa-aack/comment-page-1/#comment-5902 ThatNickGuy Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:34:07 +0000 http://comiccritics.com/?p=928#comment-5902 YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

*ahem* Yes, well…*straightens himself up*

That is to say…I am quite pleased by this sudden return.

]]> By: Animaniac http://comiccritics.com/2012/02/15/2142012-were-baa-aack/comment-page-1/#comment-5900 Animaniac Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:50:45 +0000 http://comiccritics.com/?p=928#comment-5900 Is it bad that I’m excited to see these duck pictures you speak of?

]]>